Fig. 1: Crinum mauritianum Lodd. A native to
Madagascar. Only a few collectors have this species which was photographed
by Mrs. D. C. Sheppard. The species is sometimes confused with
C. firmifolium due to past publication errors.
|
Fig. 2: Crinum hildebrandth. This Crinum
was identified as a sessiled flowered C. crassicaule by
Gordon McNeil, but it apppears to be a form of Crinum hildebrandth
common to Madagascar and north costal KwaZula (Natal). It desires a
humid location. The tepals are near 8 mm. wide and the subsessile
pedicels up to 2-3 cm. long.
|
Fig. 3: C. crassicaule? One of the
few sessile flowered Crinum found in the KwaZulu area.
The identity is currently open to question, but appears to be
C. crassicaule. The tepals are 8mm. wide while the immature
buds and tepal tubes are a reddish-purple.
|
Fig. 4: Crinum defixum Ker-Gawler. This plant was
originally identified as C. asiaticum by Linnaeus in his 1753
Species plantarum, but Ker-Gawler recognized the
Radix toxicara Rumph since it was cited erroneously in Linnaeus'
second edition of Species plantarum II as a C. asiaticum
variant. He then rather subtly renamed the original Linnaean specimen
C. defixum without giving credit to Linnaeus. The C. defixum
is native to the east coast of India, and was correctly identified by William
Roxburgh as Linnaeus' original type form.
|
Fig. 5: Crinum firmifolium, tentative identification.
The bulb was received from Madagascar by Greg Pettit in Kwazulu (ex Natal).
The blossoms (4 to 6) are sessile while the tepals are ensiform. Its features
suggest an adaptation to a windy location.
|